澳洲论文代写推荐:企业社会责任,paper代写,悉尼assignment代写

澳洲论文代写推荐: BUSS5000企业社会责任

这是悉大BUSS5000管理课的essay，企业社会责任作为一种方式影响着企业的决策。本文通过分析3篇期刊文章或书籍章节，批判性分析文章的观点。这些来源说明了企业社会责任的重要性以及它对决策的影响。

ASSESSMENT 2: Annotated Bibliography

Introduction

This annotated bibliography has reviewed four journal articles or book chapters, three of which are related to a specific topic, and one related to critical thinking in business (see Reference list for full details of the source). The following paper contains annotations and a critical analysis of the published work.

Annotations and Critical Analysis

Valued-Based Management with Corporate Social Responsibility (Martin, Petty,& Wallace, 2009) gives comprehensive explanations on the importance to add Corporate Social Responsibility to value-based management (VBM), forming a model called value(s)-based management. To valid its arguments, chapters 6--Chapter 6 Corporate Social Responsibility: Putting the S in Value(s)-Based Management—demonstrates how several companies engage in CSR and gain success because of such engagement. At the meantime, to prove its theary further, it also applies Sony as negative example, which suffers a lot due to ignoring CSR in business management. Generally speaking, the chapter 6 is well organized, with instructive introduction, well arranged subheading, and concise summary. In addition, the language style of the chapter 6 is explicit and candid, with which it declares clearly how CSR help managers achieve great success and goes to the root of those companies’ problem with CSR.

More importantly, dialectical reasons for the theary listed on the chapter 6 fit well in explaining how adopting Corporate Social Responsibility as an approach might affect decision making in a business. The reasons demonstrate that CSR have influential function on human resources, risk management, brand differentiation, and avoidance of government interference. All these parts influenced by CSR belong to the realm of decision making in a business. In addition, the cases applied in the chapter 6 are brilliant colorful. For example, in the column of “A Public Relations Nightmare”, it uses antitheses to validate its viewpoint by taking comparison between Augusta National Golf and Bank of America. What’s more, the cases of Henry Miller and Whole Foods Market give evident witness on that CSR make good business sense. And finally it also describes the awful episodes of Sony in details, including negative comments from customers.

Corporate Social Responsibility:  the roles of business in sustainable development (Oliver, 2014)  is a useful book which provides detailed information related closely to corporate social responsibility(CSR). The book is divided into 5 charters, among them, chapter 2 –The purpose of business: the basic issue—is the most  satisfying source to answer how corporate social responsibility affect decision making in business.

The chapter 2 employs theSouth Africacase to illustrate that adopting CSR approach in a business would work to restore trust. It is said that if there is gap between what actions a company is taking and what the society expect,  the loss of trust and increasing regulation would emerge, then the company would lose its legitimacy. In this case, Leon Sullivan is a charismatic representative to advocate companies to assume their expended roles with economic power to dismantling apartheid. Frankly speaking, the book has applied a great number of cases to valid the importance of CSR. In addition, it lists some previous famous literate works and quote properly to explain why it is essential to fulfill corporate responsibility.. Remarks in this book are classic and legitimate, among them, one remark is most impressive, “Where there is power, there is also responsibility”.—the iron law of business responsibility. As a result, it is imperative for companies to adopt CSR approach to gain their legitimacy. In this chapter, Bill Gates is also listed as an leader to assume her expanded role, and he explain his philosophy of business as “creative capitalism”. The case of Bill Gates is universally acknowledged, and therefore would be able to inspire effectively companies to get involved. In conclusion, both the case and analysis of CSR is accurate, logistic, and easy to understand. What’s more, its structure is coherent, and well arranged.

Board Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility (Boubaker& Nguyen, 2012) is divided into part one and part two, introducing respectively board director and corporative social responsibility (shorted as CSR). Chapter 11—Corporate Social Responsibility and the Board’s role inSwitzerland--is arranged in part II. It mainly describes how board directors obey to CSR with the supervision of company law, regulatory standards, and its commitment to charities. It also demonstrates the board of directors’ role in CSR, corporate characteristics corresponding social responsibility.

Actually, the chapter 11 is not a very good source to articulate how CSR affect decision making process in business, through it introduces the composition of the board, detailed regulations related to CSR, and practical cases study ofSwitzerland. The introduction of chapter 11 is unable to answer specifically the question raised before. Furthermore, there are some strengths and weaknesses in the chapter. On the one hand, the strengths involve rigorous article structure, dialectical language style, mathematic analysis, visualization of tables. On the other hand, the weakness--that the chapter is so obscure that readers are unable to understand at first reading—is very clear, because it applies mathematic tools to validate its theary. To sum up, the source in chapter 11 is not an agreeable choose to interpret how CSR exerts effects on decision making.

Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility ( Devinney, 2009) is an article that gives critical thinking about corporative social responsibility(CSR). In general, the article has articulated author’s argument through coherent framework, vulgar language, provocative questions, and logical reasoning. Besides, it applies mathematical equation to make inference cogent. However, there also exist annoying flaws in this article. For instance, the author has the fault at excess wordage and long-winded language style.

On the behalf of profit-organizations, the article debates against the universal acknowledgement of the importance of social responsibility in corporations. It holds that corporations’ goal is to make maximized profits through effective methods to utilize resources. It is said that corporations live to attain plenty of economic margins, not to be responsible for solving social problems. They would strive for their own welfare, instead of general public well-being. If there are conflicting demands between them and the public, corporations would put priority to their own desires and ignore the social standards. Therefore, when faced with regulation of CSR, corporations’ action would be contingent, depending on whether such endeavors would produce fruit for shareholders and key stakeholders within the organizations. In other word, before taking measures to obey CSR, corporations would make detailed and strategic evaluations. If the compliance does not bring benefrt, they would give refusal. Otherwise, they are willing to fulfill their CSR when endeavors deserve good outcome. After all, corporations live naturally on pursuing profit from their endeavors.  The author also echoes the plausibility of the reward brought by CSR to corporations. Actually, there is no a myriad of convincing evidence to support that CSR brings supranormal returns to corporations. Overall, the article gives a clear understanding and articulation of the nature of profit-organizations and why CSR is not inevitable to them.

Conclusion

This annotated bibliography goes over   three books and one article related to corporation social responsibility ( see Reference List for full details of those sources ). For the foregoing 3 books, the focuses are concentrated on one certain chapter within them. In more detail, they are sources that illustrate the importance of CSR and how it affect decision making. As for the last one source, the article has different viewpoints from those of the former 3 books. For each source seleated from online databases at the University of Sydney, all relevant analysis and detailed assessment of each source has been depicted with two paragraphs.